• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Fenntucky Mike

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    1,538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    134

Everything posted by Fenntucky Mike

  1. I'm sure that they'll remove the unissued notes, that's been my experience at any rate. I don't like the removal of unissued notes unless PMG was to create a different set that included them, which they won't. Some unissued notes are readily available and in many people's collections some are not, or are only available as specimens, etc.. My vote would be to include unissued notes in the set registries but give them a 0 points value.
  2. This shouldn't details grade but it will receive a mention on the holder of "annotations" and probably won't get EPQ. Both of which will decrease the value, by how much it's hard to say but based on what I can see of the condition of the note in the image you posted probably not too much as it appears to be heavily circulated. I'm assuming that this is one of the duplicated S# notes and that you have the match to it? That adds another layer but I would start with what is the overall condition of the note, forget about the annotation and mark for now, the note in the pictures seems to be in VF 35 range and I don't think the marks devalue it too much more because the overall condition is not great. Certainly not 50-75% in my mind.
  3. +41 = 5,706 2 Hryven +3 5 Hryven +4 20 Hryven +7 50 Hryven +4 100 Hryven +3 200 Hryven +1 1000 Hryven +5 100 Karbovantsiv +2 200 Karbowanez +2 500 Karbowanez +1 50 Shahiv +2 10 Shahiv +2 20 Shahiv +2 30 Shahiv +4 40 Shahiv +2 Interesting that some postage-stamp notes were submitted. Some additional corrections must have been made during the week by PMG, that's why the notes don't add up to 41.
  4. The best way to determine value is by checking recent auction records, Heritage, Stack's Bowers, Ebay, to name a few. I don't use the PMG price guide at all when determining FMV, but it can be used as a very general reference.
  5. PP and OPP should be fine for the short term but Mylar (BoPET) sleeves are far superior to any PP or OPP that you can buy. I use Mylar sleeves.
  6. +105 = 5,665 5 Chervontsiv +1 2 Hryven +3 5 Hryven +3 10 Hryven +5 20 Hryven +19 50 Hryven +12 100 Hryven +8 200 Hryven +9 500 Hryven +12 1000 Hryven +5 2000 Hryven +4 25 Karbovantsiv +1 100 Karbovantsiv +4 250 Karbovantsiv +1 1000 Karbovantsiv +4 50 Karbowanez +1 200 Karbowanez +2 500 Karbowanez +9 20,000 Karbovantsiv +1 50,000 Karbovantsiv +1
  7. If you send it in PMG will look at it. It will come back as a non error, with a notation of "teller stamp", seems like a terrible waste of money to me. Things to think about, the teller's stamp is interrupted, in a straight vertical line where a strap would be, with the lower portion of LOOMIS missing. The teller's stamp is obviously over the underprinting and appears to be over the second printing as well, meaning the stamp would had to been applied prior to the torch being printed. How would a LOOMIS stamp be applied between printings?
  8. That's just a generic link to ebay that automatically pops up but here is a LINK to the note. Actually, if you just type in PMG SAMPLE several different PMG sample notes pop up.
  9. Looks like a Loomis stamp. Someone was a little sloppy when they stamped the strap and got most of it on the note. The black is faded on the red torch because it didn't adhere to it well or faded, I think. Doesn't seem like an error to me.
  10. Gotta love that Ukrainian Hryvnia. I've seen this same type note used by PMG for samples given at other shows. Did you go to HICC? Here's the same type note used for a sample in an older Gen 3 holder. It's for sale on Ebay if you're interested.
  11. Maybe the file type was one that won't work, .jpg, .tiff, gif. files all seem to work best for me, and I always have to shrink down the image to reduce the file size. Try it again, sometimes this site is tempermental.
  12. +43 = 5,560 20 Hryven +11 50 Hryven +5 100 Hryven +2 200 Hryven +3 500 Hryven +5 1000 Hryven +2 1 Hryvnia +2 25 Karbovantsiv +1 50 Karbovantsiv +1 100 Karbovantsiv +1 1000 Karbovantsiv +7 1,000,000 Karbovantsiv +1 2,000,000 Karbovantsiv +1 2 Karbowanez +1
  13. +58 = 5,517 5 Hryven +1 10 Hryven +2 20 Hryven +5 50 Hryven +3 100 Hryven +4 500 Hryven +5 25 Karbovantsiv +1 50 Karbovantsiv +1 100 Karbovantsiv +1 1000 Karbovantsiv +32 5 Karbowanez +1 10 Karbowanez +2
  14. It's worth having authenticated in my opinion, just so people know it's real, and the best wat to determine value is by researching recent auction sales of notes with similar errors. Stack's, Heritage, ebay, etc., etc., etc,... PMG won't list error pricing and they don't differentiate between notes and error notes in the Pop Report, not that I've ever seen anyway.
  15. It's call and offset printing error, it happens when there is no paper between the printing plate and impression cylinder, ink is transferred from the plate to the cylinder then the ink on the cylinder will transfer to the opposite side of the next several sheets until the ink is gone. Value depends on how visible and large the area affected is, your note has a strong transfer but only about 2/3's of the design was transferred. I'd say it could fetch in the $1-$2,000 range, maybe a little more. Nice find.
  16. I don't know what the note is graded now but if you "clean" the note it will almost certainly be returned as "cleaned", and worst case they return the note in a body bag. My recommendation is to leave the note alone! It won't grade higher because it was "cleaned", it will probably be graded more harshly with additional notations on it being cleaned, it will be less desirable to collectors, and decrease the value of the note.
  17. +25 = 5,459 5 Chervontsiv +1 2 Hryven +3 5 Hryven +1 10 Hryven +2 20 Hryven +8 50 Hryven +2 100 Hryven +2 200 Hryven +1 500 Hryven -1 100 Karbovantsiv +1 1000 Karbovantsiv +4 2 Karbowanez +1
  18. +115 = 5,435 2 Hryven +3 5 Hryven +8 10 Hryven +15 20 Hryven +21 50 Hryven +5 100 Hryven +15 200 Hryven +6 500 Hryven +3 1000 Hryven +1 2000 Hryven +8 2 Hryvni +1 1 Hryvnia +5 1 Karbovanets +1 10 Karbovantsiv +3 100 Karbovantsiv +3 1000 Karbovantsiv +3 5000 Karbovantsiv +2 10,000 Karbovantsiv +2 1 Karbowanez +1 20 Karbowanez +3 100 Karbowanez +1 100,000 Karbovantsiv +1 20,000 Karbovantsiv +2 50,000 Karbovantsiv +1 1,050,000 Karbovantsiv +1
  19. Possible obstructed printing but seeing as the color loss stops/stars at the center fold it seems more likely that the underprint faded or was lost due to circulation. Regardless, if an actual error, the note would only be worth face value or slightly above due to the condition.
  20. At least they gave you an estimate, but I'd still try to find some comps before listing on ebay. Good luck!
  21. +36 = 5,320 2 Hryven +1 10 Hryven +3 20 Hryven +5 50 Hryven +3 100 Hryven +3 200 Hryven +2 500 Hryven +1 1 Hryvnia +1 50 Karbovantsiv +1 1000 Karbovantsiv +3 5000 Karbovantsiv +1 1,000,000 Karbovantsiv +1 2,000,000 Karbovantsiv +1 1 Karbowanez +1 5 Karbowanez +1 20 Karbowanez +4 100 Karbowanez +4
  22. Your best bet would be to check recent auction sales on sites like HA, SB, Ebay, etc..