-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Pastime Classics
Member-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Days Won
1
-
Lamb7 reacted to a post in a topic: PMG Bank of England database update/correction needed
-
PMG Bank of England database update/correction needed
Pastime Classics replied to Pastime Classics's topic in Ask PMG
Hi Alli, Thanks for your help. As a point of reference, among the certification numbers are: 2300005-003, 2300005-014, 2300010-002, 2300020-001, and 2300050-001. These have been re-submitted as a Re-Grade under soon-to-arrive submission 2300003. More than correcting these, my goal was to get the database updated not only for my re-grades, but for everyone else who will submit these notes in the future. Thanks for bringing this to the appropriate team's attention. Thank you for all that you do. Billy -
Hi PMG, I just received a few dozen of my Bank of England King Charles III banknotes back from you and I have noticed that only the Pick#, and not the more widely used English Paper Money catalog B# was included on the label. Therefore, I'd like to respectfully ask that you update your database so that the widely used B# is also included on future labels of these King Charles III banknotes. The correct information is as follows: Pick# 398a £5 is B419 Pick# 399a £5 is B420 Pick# 400a £5 is B421 Pick# 401a £5 is B422 Thank you for helping to correct this important detail. Best regards, Billy
-
Hi PMG, I just received a few dozen of my Bank of England King Charles III banknotes back from you and I have noticed that only the Pick#, and not the more widely used English Paper Money catalog B# was included on the label. Therefore, I'd like to respectfully ask that you update your database so that the widely used B# is also included on future labels of these King Charles III banknotes. The correct information is as follows: Pick# 398a £5 is B419 Pick# 399a £5 is B420 Pick# 400a £5 is B421 Pick# 401a £5 is B422 Thank you for helping to correct this important detail. Best regards, Billy
-
David, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. It's good to know that I am not alone in supporting a "Bank of England 1928-present" set. Your comments on affordability are on the mark, in my opinion. In my email to PMG outlining the benefits of a 1928-present set, I also brought up the outright lack of availability of many pre-World War I notes, the high denomination White Notes in particular. Even if someone had a pile of unlimited cash to build a set, it may still be impossible to complete the 1902-present set, as most of the few surviving higher denomination notes reside only in museum collections. Personally, I believe the collecting community would benefit from the creation of both a "Bank of England 1928-Present Type Set (issued Notes)" and a "Bank of England 1928-Present Type Set with varieties (Issued Notes)" to help improve set completion chances, affordability, and coverage of varieties (such as the p374 example). In any event, I thank Ali and PMG for their help with and consideration of these requests. Best regards, Billy
-
Thank you for your comment, David. I have also asked PMG to created new registry sets to specifically separate out Bank of England notes from 1928-present (as opposed to only including them with the Great Britain 1902-Date "Master" set. I am curious on your thoughts about having these additional Modern-Period Registry Sets. Best Regards, Billy
-
Pastime Classics reacted to a post in a topic: Opinions Wanted - Correction needed to the Great Britain 1902-Date, Type Set, Issued Notes Registry Set?
-
PMG Registry - Request a new slot or set here!
Pastime Classics replied to Ali E.'s topic in PMG Registry
Hello again PMG, Concerning banknotes from Great Britain, I would love to see the addition of several denomination-specific competitive sets in the Registry. For example: Bank of England, £5 notes, complete with varieties or Great Britain, Treasury and Bank of England, £1 notes, complete with varieties. Or something along those lines. There are many of these denomination-specific competitive sets for United States banknotes, and I believe they would work just as well for such a widely collected category such as banknotes from Great Britain. Is there a more formal way to propose the addition of these competitive sets, or is this the way to do it? Thanks for your time and consideration. Best regards, Billy -
PMG Registry - Request a new slot or set here!
Pastime Classics replied to Ali E.'s topic in PMG Registry
Hello again PMG, A slot for the following note should be added to the "Small Size Federal Reserve Note $1 Set" Registry Set: Fr# 3005-E* 2017A $1 Green (FW) Carranza Mnuchin FW Richmond *Star* note There is a slot for the non-star note (Fr# 3005-E), but not this star note, which is a key to the series. Also, I'd like to know when slots for the Series 2021 $1 notes will be added to this Registry Set. Thanks for your help! Regards, Billy -
Hello all, I'd like to ask for your opinions concerning a Great Britain Registry Set. Does anyone else feel that the following notes should be removed as "slots" in the "Great Britain 1902-Date, Type Set, Issued Notes" Registry Set because they are Unissued Notes? In my opinion, unissued notes should not be part of an "Issued Notes" registry set: * 5 Shillings 1919 ND First Issue P352 T27 ND (1919) 5/- Shillings - Sign. N.K.W. Fisher- Unissued GBR352 * 1 Shilling 1919 ND Second Issue P353 T29 ND (1919) 1/- Shilling - Sign. N.K.W. Fisher- Unissued GBR353 * 2 Shillings - 6 Pence 1940-41 ND Emergency Issue P364 B254 ND (1941) 2/- Shillings 6 Pence Sign. K.O. Peppiatt- Unissued GBR364 * 5 Shillings 1940-41 ND Emergency Issue P365 B253 ND (1941) 5/- Shillings Sign. K.O. Peppiatt- Unissued GBR365 I've submitted this issue to PMG for review and will be awaiting their reply, but I also wanted to send out this request for opinions from the Forum group, too. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. Please let me know if you agree or why I am wrong. Again, my justification for the request for removal is that Unissued notes should not hold slots in an "Issued Notes" Registry set, such as this one is. Best Regards, Billy