Whitewashqtr Posted July 24, 2019 Report Share Posted July 24, 2019 (edited) Recently submitted this to PMG as a raw note (dealer listed it as "CH. UNC.") and wanted to get some feedback on what board members would think the grade came back as. Will reveal after sufficient amount of responses. I took the serial number out of the image as to not give away (hopefully) where this came from. Edited July 24, 2019 by Whitewashqtr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlars Posted November 12, 2019 Report Share Posted November 12, 2019 Gorgeous note. At a glance it looks UNC. And that centering looks at least 65. BUT put the note under side-lighting and check the shadows... maybe a light fold or two? Then we're looking at AU, maybe 55. An XF would be surprising, maybe justified if deep folds had been pressed out, or other processing/cleaning has flattened the embossing, weakened the note, etc. But like I said - that's a beauty. I'd be a proud owner! Steve in Tampa 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve in Tampa Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Beautiful note. I agree with @jlars and will add that two-dimensional (flat) photos do not tell the whole story. Side lighting is necessary to get a better idea to the notes overall condition...as illustrated here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooter 1 Posted May 14, 2020 Report Share Posted May 14, 2020 Although, the embossing looks better in the lower photo 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
