• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

manofwar

Member
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by manofwar

  1. Well Goldfiger1969, You may be correct and perhaps with merit. But to me the convertibility is exactly the pertinent difference between but also the most important issue at hand. The different printings or artwork as it were, was the key value maker, why aren't there print multiples? I just think it curious of why I can buy a $20.00 frn 1928 a or b at ms 66 or 67 top of the line, well try to get a 1928 gold certificate at those grades, you will need to add a grand. I do not think there is any shortage of 28 GC'S I could be wrong? OOPS!
  2. To the point of available material, if FRN's were equally consider gold certificates as you put it, I think the prices for the one would equalize accordingly. Just a Thought manofwaar
  3. Howdy Fenntucky Mike, When it comes to "certified" notes I think there is an issue. later, manofwar
  4. Hi, just in the most basic way, obviously, being redeemable for gold. In form both are paper facsimiles of money, value, all the same thing. When it comes to the value of collector grade paper money, the premiums are quite different. I have to wonder why, is it because where it says gold or the size of the word, or just simply the look of the currency did not change it was just a change of series. Just curious? manofwar
  5. Do most agree there is a significant disparity between the FRN'S and other gold certificates. Yes I spoke specifically, I do consider them the same for the obvious facts, I wonder why so many others act to the contrary? Any thoughts?
  6. Hi all, I am wondering if there is a significant difference between the 7th and the 10th editions, I can not find the 10th. I am specifically looking for the information on "Changeover Pairs". Thanks, manofwar
  7. Hi KaileeS CS, I have to apologize for any confusion I have conveyed to you and or others. I am on very strong medications due to my health and I frequently find it difficult to explain what I want to discuss. To attempt to be clearer I am working on collecting "Chainover Pairs, including the reverse version of the same and have now learned about the completion of sets thereof, I am totally new to paper currency Sincerely, Bill Kline
  8. NickiO CS, I certainly appreciate your timely response and explanation given. I have certainly availed myself of your "Glossary" which has been very helpful especially for us "Newbies".. I still will take this opportunity to ask, Why have what seem to me one of the most obvious, logical and very profitable potential sources for the high end fututure "Currency Collectable points of interest, Consider the rarity numbers and consider a mutually benefits that may excite the general public and by doing something to the effects of leaving clues to which series is going to leave clues. Sincerely, William H Kline 59633 Sun Mesa dr, P. O Box 701 Joshua Tree, CA. 82252
  9. I am wondering if anyone knows of a name for the completed "Change-Over" string of notes, "A Reverse Change-over pair and the Foreword-Pair? I was also wondering are in the census of these? Just thinking about it, manofwar1
  10. Thanks for the response and I am trying to figure out how to get them for way back in the forum and to get the pictures placed correctly, I too am sure others collect these changeovers and are quite varied as you said. I think I have the first 1934 C, the last C and the D all 1934 and the CW,"Wide" and Narrow testing all of which seems to have jumbled up some of the data, may just me not having a clue too! Later manofwar1 PS the year 2003 seems to have more than one duplicating serial numbers.
  11. Hey FenntuckyMike, Just wondering if yiu or anyone else have these sort of changeovers/turnover, in their collections? I have yet to see any o t these that I purchased and Now I am taken by these turnovers the focus of my collecting now. Later,manofwr1
  12. The other noyes are duplicated SN from 2003 and 2003A Later manofwar
  13. I do not know how to get the photos right way up, I tried both ways and all upside down. My thought about these notes (1934 C to C ) and (to D) series any thoughts? It seems the A<B<C<D series may have been small. I think I will try to find out. Later manofwar
  14. Well another try at my new notes:
  15. My Oh MY, very classic beauty. Well I am going to show a new pair worth discussion I think. Well again not working saying the individual photos are to large. back the drawing board........
  16. Well now I have a "new purchase", I feel is worth posting. I will provide pictures when I receive the notes and I have them in hand, buy I will say the 2 notes are the $10.00 FRN crossover from C to D , 1934 CW and both with a fair grade of GEM UNC EPQ, Now I will be anxiously for the postal delivery to receive this new prize. Now I have to figure out how mine fits into the picture since mine while virtually everything identical. Any Thoughts? Thanks, manofwar1
  17. i am seeing some very nice artwork and style in these notes from other places, very nice, i will try posting one of my favorite note, just wish I only hope to eventually find a smaller serial number and the star of course.
  18. While I understand what you are saying about the fact the charts, 32 impression specifically do show how and even someone with close s n, but I for one get a it more curious when one does include the sequential numbering?
  19. Oh Well, I can not get the ending in 5 and 6 wont work, do not know why, but it is literally in my hand now. Any thoughts?
  20. I think maybe these may have been one of h BEP deals or something to that effect. Just a thought manofwar1
  21. There are 2 of the 4 I am Scared Now!!!!!!
  22. Lets see if my skills have improved at all:
  23. I wonder what other folks opinions are about this and what any one has taken advantage of acquiring from the gift shop? I also have to wonder if this concept had ever been done in the past? The following is from the book by Whitman and Bowers: the total reading is last paragraph on page 82 and all of 83. As my OCD takes me down this road regarding the, (The Mysterious "o"'s) as the "Plate Position Mark", mine are on silver certificates, 1935 U-I block and are consecutively numbered. Thanks for any time and thoughts on the subject, manofwar1 Last Paragraph, page 83, "The excellent relations between BEP and Collectors have continued and expanded since then. Perhaps the ultimate gesture of good faith has been the printing of "error"notes, star notes ordinarily made to replace to replace defective notes, but now made in limited printing for sale at a premium to numismatists. These products have been widely appreciated and typically the sale of limited edition products, including unusual serial numbers, star notes and the like is a quick sell out."