• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

manofwar

Member
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    5

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi KaileeS CS, I have to apologize for any confusion I have conveyed to you and or others. I am on very strong medications due to my health and I frequently find it difficult to explain what I want to discuss. To attempt to be clearer I am working on collecting "Chainover Pairs, including the reverse version of the same and have now learned about the completion of sets thereof, I am totally new to paper currency Sincerely, Bill Kline
  2. NickiO CS, I certainly appreciate your timely response and explanation given. I have certainly availed myself of your "Glossary" which has been very helpful especially for us "Newbies".. I still will take this opportunity to ask, Why have what seem to me one of the most obvious, logical and very profitable potential sources for the high end fututure "Currency Collectable points of interest, Consider the rarity numbers and consider a mutually benefits that may excite the general public and by doing something to the effects of leaving clues to which series is going to leave clues. Sincerely, William H Kline 59633 Sun Mesa dr, P. O Box 701 Joshua Tree, CA. 82252
  3. I am wondering if anyone knows of a name for the completed "Change-Over" string of notes, "A Reverse Change-over pair and the Foreword-Pair? I was also wondering are in the census of these? Just thinking about it, manofwar1
  4. Thanks for the response and I am trying to figure out how to get them for way back in the forum and to get the pictures placed correctly, I too am sure others collect these changeovers and are quite varied as you said. I think I have the first 1934 C, the last C and the D all 1934 and the CW,"Wide" and Narrow testing all of which seems to have jumbled up some of the data, may just me not having a clue too! Later manofwar1 PS the year 2003 seems to have more than one duplicating serial numbers.
  5. Hey FenntuckyMike, Just wondering if yiu or anyone else have these sort of changeovers/turnover, in their collections? I have yet to see any o t these that I purchased and Now I am taken by these turnovers the focus of my collecting now. Later,manofwr1
  6. The other noyes are duplicated SN from 2003 and 2003A Later manofwar
  7. I do not know how to get the photos right way up, I tried both ways and all upside down. My thought about these notes (1934 C to C ) and (to D) series any thoughts? It seems the A<B<C<D series may have been small. I think I will try to find out. Later manofwar
  8. My Oh MY, very classic beauty. Well I am going to show a new pair worth discussion I think. Well again not working saying the individual photos are to large. back the drawing board........
  9. Well now I have a "new purchase", I feel is worth posting. I will provide pictures when I receive the notes and I have them in hand, buy I will say the 2 notes are the $10.00 FRN crossover from C to D , 1934 CW and both with a fair grade of GEM UNC EPQ, Now I will be anxiously for the postal delivery to receive this new prize. Now I have to figure out how mine fits into the picture since mine while virtually everything identical. Any Thoughts? Thanks, manofwar1
  10. i am seeing some very nice artwork and style in these notes from other places, very nice, i will try posting one of my favorite note, just wish I only hope to eventually find a smaller serial number and the star of course.
  11. While I understand what you are saying about the fact the charts, 32 impression specifically do show how and even someone with close s n, but I for one get a it more curious when one does include the sequential numbering?
  12. Oh Well, I can not get the ending in 5 and 6 wont work, do not know why, but it is literally in my hand now. Any thoughts?
  13. I think maybe these may have been one of h BEP deals or something to that effect. Just a thought manofwar1